Profile

In 1985 I arrived in Italy with my diploma, a couple of prizes in composition and about a dozen of pieces about which I felt reasonably confident. My first confrontation with the great italian composers of the day somewhat shocked my convictions and put a strain on my daily life: it's true that Petrassi was gentle with me and gave me words of encouragment; but both Manzoni in Milano and Donatoni in Siena showed me in earnest the difficulties of the way ahead and throw me in a struggle that was going to last for years. I toiled with books and scores, going to every concert in town and around, visiting libraries and museums, trying to find my way out of the maze of contemporary art.

During my sojourn in Europe I wrote the quintet Tritimes, -to be premiered years after in Boston-, Finilitudes, for piano and percussion -premiered in Siena- and a vast and somewhat pretentious piece for twenty-one string soloists, Omenoni, to which I owe some awards but which has been since, as often happens, never performed. In that work I tried my hand at a kind of 'alphabetic serialism' which derives proportions, pitch, durations and the rest of the structural components from a literary source -in this event, a fragment of a book of P.D. Ouspensky in its italian translation-; given that the amount of letters exceeds the chromatic set, it was necessary to enlarge the repertoire of pitch including quarters of tone -imagine the happiness of the performers!-, thus arriving to the number 21 which permeates, as it were, the whole composition. 

Back in Buenos Aires, I unfolded this procedure in another set of pieces:
Triades I & II, (for violin, cello and piano), Stasera (for guitar, based on a short poem by Ungaretti), Epitafios (for female voice and piano, on poems by J.R.Jiménez), and Ouroboros, for nine performers. 

This last piece was not based in a text, but in the  manipulation of relationships derived from the nine letters of  its name; in this work, in which I laboured for long months, I approached the ideas of fractal construction derived from the studies of Benoit Mandelbrot, which were totally unknown to me at that time. 

In 1988 I went to USA for a Master Program in the New England Conservatory of Boston. I had already grew bored with my esoteric pet serial procedures and, under new and fresh influences - mainly from my instructor, Robert Cogan, chairman of the Theory Dept.- I undertook new explorations, this time concerning the long design of a piece, the sonic quality of it, and the interaction between visual and sound proportions. The first results of this research were In the doldrums -commissioned by the Deknatel Quartet-, Sun, el viento  -for six woodwinds, first performed at the N.E.C.-, the Double-piano variations and Yzur, for organ; all this pieces dealt with different questions derived from the application of the Fibonacci series.  

Back again in Argentina, I underwent a somewhat 'dark' period; for a number of years, I was not capable to finish a new piece. I had all kinds of doubts: about language, about structure, about form, about meaning, about all and everything! Personal crisis and financial struggle came together, as usual, and for a while I just gave up. Then, out of failure and confusion, and quite unexpectedly, it came out a series of piano pieces, written in a semi-conscious frame of mind: it was to become the Album 1996, thirty three pieces in six series, that shortly after was recorded  by IRCO. That was the prelude to a period of intense production, characterised by the close relationship with a group of excellent performers: the mezzo-soprano Marta Blanco -Nanas de Felisa, Los Puentes, Blanca per Blanco and Ocho Haiku-; pianists Federico Jusid -Five pieces 1998-, José Luis Juri - Mar blanco-, and Claudio Espector -Microclimas and Vulnerata Musica-, cellist Leo Viola -Duo per Leo, Tres Soliloquios for cello and piano, and the Trio 1999. Among other pieces dedicated to friends and colleagues came Trio per Drago -violin solo-, Due -violin and piano-, Tre per Frette -marimba-, Percorsi a tre and Percorsi a quattro. Also came the commissions for Sennin -chamber opera based on a tale by R.Akutagawa- and Quattro per Jusid, for piano and symphonic orchestra; both pieces were premiered in 1999, with a quite good reception from the public. 

I cannot explain out the characteristics of this new phase, because I am still too much involved with it. The music is certainly more simple and transparent than it used to be; the importance of silence is still greater, the direction of lines is prevalent and durations tend to isochronism. Origami -for harp and symphonic orchestra-, Ecos de Travesía -for string orchestra-, and Kaleidos -for cello and orchestra- look as series of tiny landscapes, concerned mainly with colours and broad movements through register. 

Years 2003 and 2004 were dedicated to genres that I had never considered before, as piano sonata and the big opera. The Sonata Selena was composed for Uruguayan pianist Sergio Elena, and Rosas emerged from the powerfull libretto by writer and regisseur José María Gómez Ferreyra. Both pieces -although obvious differences in scale and tenure- share many details of language and structure, and prove quite demanding on performers.

2005 presents as a year devoted to orchestral music: not less than four major symphonic orchestras have scheduled my pieces round the season with leading conductors in Paraná, Buenos Aires, Mendoza and Tucumán.

About the next step in this uncertain voyage of trial and error, I can only guess that it has to do with what the ancient russian folk-tale points thus:  

"go you don't know where

 seek you don't know what.."

J.G.Noble

Note: This page is optimized for 800x600 pixeles. Please set your browser to this resolution.

mailto:javier_gimenez_noble